Next:
List of Figures
Up:
Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics
Previous:
Acknowledgements
Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
Introduction
Definitions and Assumptions
Sense variation
Chapter summaries
Lexical Representation
Introduction
Jackendoff and syntactically-relevant semantics
Components of Jackendoff's Conceptual Semantics
Semantic Decomposition
A Semantic Ontology
Thematic role relations
Functions relating entities
Jackendoff and inferences
Thematic role relations
Functions relating entities
Selectional restrictions
Conclusions
Conceptual Structure and HPSG
Lexical Semantics in HPSG
Nouns in HPSG
Verbs in HPSG
Utility of the representation
Incorporation of Jackendoff's theory into HPSG
Davis' multiple-inheritance lexical semantics
Davis' relation types
Comparison with Jackendoff (1983, 1990)
Functions vs. Relations
States and Events
Extended relations
Polysemy
Necessary Extensions
Nominals
Preposition semantics
A situation index
Defaults
Summary
Verb semantics
Internal and External verb semantics
Formalisation of the representation within HPSG
An example of the representation
Nominal semantics
Conclusions
Prepositional Phrases and Verb Semantics
Introduction
Adjuncts or Complements?
Syntactic Tests for Argument Structure
The ``do so'' Test
Iterability test
Relative Order
Complement-Internal Gaps
Semantic Tests for Argument Structure
Constancy of Semantic Contribution
Entailment Tests
Conclusions
Pseudo-Complements
Definition and Relation to adjuncts
Pseudo-complement semantics
The -dative pseudo-complement
The -dative pseudo-complement
Pseudo-complement lexical semantic compatibility
Conclusions
Adjuncts
Characteristics of adjuncts to be accounted for
Adjuncts have an unchanging semantic contribution
Restrictive, Operator, and Thematic adjuncts
Surface order vs. Semantic precedence
Redundancy constraints
Interspersal of adjuncts with complements (Mittelfeld phenomena)
The standard HPSG approach
A ``Semantic Obliqueness'' hierarchy
The lexical rule approach
Conclusions
Semantic Integration
Adjunct semantics
The
op-adjuncts
feature
Lexical rules
Dative alternation
Conclusions
Manner of Motion Verbs and Resultatives
Introduction
Levin and Rappaport Hovav (1995)
The account
Problems with the Levin and Rappaport Hovav analysis
Auxiliary Selection
Resultative Constructions
Causative Alternation
Conclusions
Semantic properties
The meaning of the constructions
Argument Structure
Idiosyncrasy of Resultatives
Conclusions
Wechsler
Wechsler's approach
Discussion of the approach
The problem of the `canonical end state'
The problem of the optional TELOS feature
The problem of idiosyncrasy
Semantics
Conclusions
Construction Grammar
Criteria which the solution must satisfy
What licenses the constructions?
Why are only two classes of unergative verbs different from all the others?
Semantics of the constructions
Semantic restrictedness
The proposal
Resultatives
Formalisation in HPSG
Ruling out ungrammatical instances
The other constructions
Manner of Motion verbs
Unaccusatives
Verbs of Sound Emission
Conclusions
Causativisation revisited
Idiosyncrasy and Pragmatics
Conclusions
Logical Metonymy
Introduction
Analysis of the meaning variation
The range of the data
Word knowledge represented in Qualia Structure
Problematic data
An Analysis
Proposed constraints on Logical Metonymy
Godard & Jayez (1993)
Pustejovsky & Bouillon
Problematic data remaining
An Alternative
{eventive verb + VP}
{eventive verb + NP} and Corpus-supported conventions
The Analysis: Methodology and Assumptions
The Data
Conclusions about Logical Metonymy
The Representation
Logical Metonymy and Pragmatics
The Analysis
Infeasibility of a purely pragmatic explanation
Choice of eventive structure
Conclusions
Computational Issues
Introduction
What we want from a Computational Lexicon
Polysemy
Homonymy vs. Polysemy
Lyons
Cruse
Kilgarriff
Perspectives on the representation of polysemy
Multiple Lexical Entries
Regular Polysemy
Underspecified Representations
Lexical Disambiguation
Acquisition of the Lexicon
Machine Readable Dictionaries
Corpus-based Acquisition
Prospects for automatic lexicon acquisition
Linguistic analysis plus Conventionality
Conclusions
Summary
Future Research
References